A major expansion of 65 year old infrastructure
How will expanding the Trans Mountain Pipeline impact the landscape?
Share the facts
Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion
The current expansion project adds a second, larger pipe that follows the existing pipeline’s path for 73% of the route and existing utility corridors, like highways and powerlines, for 16% of the route. The remaining 11% will follow new routes, mostly to accommodate new urban areas that have emerged along the original pipeline route over the past 60 years. Because the pipeline runs underground, most people in those areas aren’t aware it’s there.
How the pipeline expansion route was decided
Community land use including residences, commercial, recreation and parks
Environmentally sensitive areas including water crossings, wetlands and wildlife
Engineering considerations including public and worker safety, technical constraints and construction techniques, geotechnical conditions, pipeline length and the number of crossings of existing roads and utility lines
Gaining support and approval for the route requires extensive consultation with local communities. Consultation helps identify concerns, issues and suggested improvements, which can result in changes and improvements to the route.
In assessing the project and identifying 157 project conditions, the initial 686-day National Energy Board review process:
reviewed 15,000 pages in the original application
processed 17,000 information requests from 400 intervenors
received 378 letters of comment from 1,600 participants, including Indigenous peoples, businesses, communities, landowners, individuals, and non-government and government organizations
Following that recommendation, the Government of Canada engaged in further consultation to hear from Canadians along the route whose views may not have been considered as part of the National Energy Board’s review. This included:
consultations with 117 potentially affected Indigenous groups
44 public meetings in Alberta and British Columbia
over 20,000 email submissions
over 35,000 responses to an online questionnaire
In addition to the required federal consultations, the company that first proposed the Trans Mountain Pipeline, Kinder Morgan, engaged in more than 5 years of public consultation with communities, Indigenous groups, landowners and other stakeholders. Their consultation process began with their announcement of the project in May 2012 and continued through to November 2017.
The federal government is working on a plan for further meaningful consultations with Indigenous communities in accordance with the Federal Court of Appeal decision of August 30, 2018.
Where the pipeline begins
Edmonton Terminal, Alberta
Where the pipeline ends
Westridge Marine Terminal, British Columbia
The terminal is designed to service Aframax-size oil tankers. At 245 meters long, this is the second-smallest of the 5 international tanker classifications. This will remain the case after the pipeline expansion as the Port of Vancouver doesn’t accommodate the three larger tanker classifications. What will change is the development of a new dock complex that can load 3 Aframax tankers while also hosting tugboats and other safety and emergency response vessels.
The Trans Mountain project team worked extensively with the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, the Pacific Pilotage Authority, and the B.C. Coast Pilots to determine a preferred dock layout, while also incorporating feedback from the City of Burnaby and community discussions. Approximately 20 different layouts were considered as part of the planning process. The location of the Westridge Marine Terminal and other nearby Trans Mountain facilities means the City of Burnaby will receive more than $250 million in property taxes over the next two decades.
Get updates in your inbox.